Creative Discussion Topics
In groups we discussed 1) scientific values, 2) our motivations to do science and 3) pitfalls of the scientific arena, focussing both on the "current" vs. "ideal" science world, and trying to visualize our discussions with simple materials available. In the forum on our last day, we presented the results, and discussed how they are interconnected, as well as how we can be a positive influence in the face of all the pitfalls, realities and dilemmas.
As our time ran out and the discussion had to come to a close, it became clear that "how to stay positive in science" remains an open question and a challenge for doctoral researchers in general. Resiliency was discussed as an important skill, as well as the importance of being able to deal with uncertainty (a recurring theme of our retreat). Bottom-up change is a small but real possibility in the academic system, but there was a common wish in the group that all stakeholders in science – early career scientists as well as senior scientists – work persistently together at keeping values and making science a more ideal arena. Keeping the conversation going with creative discussions like this one is one way of refreshing and reinforcing values, and ideally should take place more often, also within groups and departments.
Superposition-montage of the results of the three creative discussion groups showing central scientific values, the roots and fruits of motivations in science as well as pitfalls that can keep scientists from thriving. Recurring topics in each section illustrate that the questions are very interconnected.
The idea for this creative discussion was inspired by projects led by Prof. Annika Guse (LMU Munich) and Dr. Stephanie Guse https://stephanieguse.com/Thinking-Hands, who we gratefully acknowledge.
Downloads
- Science discussion montage (PDF) (3 MByte)